B120 - Exploring the Relationship Between Unit Cohesion and Musculoskeletal Injury Status in Active-Duty Military Service Members
Time: 11:00 AM - 11:50 AMTopics: Military and Veterans' Health, Social and Environmental Context and Health
Poster Number: B120
Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKI) are a prevalent and enduring threat to military readiness and health. A growing body of evidence suggests that factors such as social integration, a measure of involvement with different types of relationships and communities, may influence health outcomes in the general population. Relatedly, unit cohesion, or the bonds that hold a military unit together, has been shown to buffer psychological distress and improve unit performance. This study investigates the relationship between unit cohesion, as measured by a military-adapted Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), and MSKI status among active-duty (AD) Servicemembers (SM).
We collected GEQ scores and body composition as part of a larger study examining an array of psychosocial risk factors for MSKI among AD U.S. Army SMs (N=507). The relationship between self-reported MSKI status (binary yes/no) in the past 12-24 months and GEQ scores was evaluated using logistic regression. The key independent variables were GEQ subscales where higher scores represent greater social integration (range: subscale: 5-45; GEQ sum: 20-180): Group Integration–Task (GIT), Group Integration–Social (GIS), Individual Attractions to the Group–Task (ATGT), and Individual Attractions to the Group–Social (ATGS). Control variables included in the model were age, binary-coded gender (male), race (White), tobacco use (no), marital status (married), as well as body fat percentage (BF%).
Study participants were mostly young (25.3±6.2 years), male (83%), White (58.4%), with a mean BF% of 26.5±7.6. Nearly one third of participants endorsed a MSKI in the preceding 12-24 months (30.1%). The mean score on the overall GEQ was 87.4±43.2 (mean GIS: 18.7±6.9; GIT: 25.0±8.7; ATGT: 21.3±8.0; ATGS: 21.9±8.2). Higher scores on the ATGT subscale, indicating greater individual attraction to the group by task, demonstrated a small, but significant negative association with injury status (b=-0.0105, p<.01) while controlling for other known predictors of MSKI such as age, tobacco use, and BF%. The model explains a modest amount of the variance in injury status (R2 = 0.067).
We found that higher individual task cohesion (ATGT) within the group is associated with reduced injury reporting, suggesting that personal commitment to group tasks may serve as a protective factor against MSKI or reporting of MSKIs among military SMs. The limited variance explained by the model underscores the complex nature of injury risk among SMs.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal disorders, Social supportWe collected GEQ scores and body composition as part of a larger study examining an array of psychosocial risk factors for MSKI among AD U.S. Army SMs (N=507). The relationship between self-reported MSKI status (binary yes/no) in the past 12-24 months and GEQ scores was evaluated using logistic regression. The key independent variables were GEQ subscales where higher scores represent greater social integration (range: subscale: 5-45; GEQ sum: 20-180): Group Integration–Task (GIT), Group Integration–Social (GIS), Individual Attractions to the Group–Task (ATGT), and Individual Attractions to the Group–Social (ATGS). Control variables included in the model were age, binary-coded gender (male), race (White), tobacco use (no), marital status (married), as well as body fat percentage (BF%).
Study participants were mostly young (25.3±6.2 years), male (83%), White (58.4%), with a mean BF% of 26.5±7.6. Nearly one third of participants endorsed a MSKI in the preceding 12-24 months (30.1%). The mean score on the overall GEQ was 87.4±43.2 (mean GIS: 18.7±6.9; GIT: 25.0±8.7; ATGT: 21.3±8.0; ATGS: 21.9±8.2). Higher scores on the ATGT subscale, indicating greater individual attraction to the group by task, demonstrated a small, but significant negative association with injury status (b=-0.0105, p<.01) while controlling for other known predictors of MSKI such as age, tobacco use, and BF%. The model explains a modest amount of the variance in injury status (R2 = 0.067).
We found that higher individual task cohesion (ATGT) within the group is associated with reduced injury reporting, suggesting that personal commitment to group tasks may serve as a protective factor against MSKI or reporting of MSKIs among military SMs. The limited variance explained by the model underscores the complex nature of injury risk among SMs.
Authors and Affliiates
Presenter: Mary Jo Boyles, M.S,, USARIEMCo-Author: Kristen L. Zosel, PT, DPT, PhD, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
Co-Author: Kathryn Taylor, ScD, USARIEM
Co-Author: Nicole Ekon, M.S., USARIEM
Co-Author: Jason Judkins, Ph.D., USARIEM
Co-Author: Leila Walker, M.S., USARIEM
Co-Author: Kristin Heaton, PhD, USARIEM
B120 - Exploring the Relationship Between Unit Cohesion and Musculoskeletal Injury Status in Active-Duty Military Service Members
Category
Scientific > Rapid Communication Poster